Jacob Rees-Mogg has declared his confidence in the governor of the Bank of England, but disputed that pension funds are at “systemic” risk.

Speaking to Sky News, the business secretary said “of course” he has confidence in Andrew Bailey, describing him as “respected”.

He questioned, however, whether there was a “systemic problem” with pensions after the Bank of England expanded its market intervention to help pension funds for the second time in two days on Tuesday by buying up index-linked gilts.

The Bank had warned of a “material risk to UK financial stability” with “fire sales” of assets if did not act.

Bank confirms market support to end – Politics latest

The business secretary said that on the whole, pension funds “aren’t at risk”, but added: “Some pension funds have taken some high risk investments.”

He told Sky News that the “rightly independent” Bank of England intervened to protect these “risky investments”.

More on Bank Of England

Yesterday, the Bank confirmed that its emergency support operation to protect pension funds would end this week.

Mr Rees-Mogg repeatedly refused to be drawn on whether the Bank was right to signal an end to its market intervention.

“I’m not going to criticise the Bank of England or the governor. It is not for me to speculate on what the Bank of England is doing,” he said.

The business secretary also insisted to Kay Burley that parts of the economy were in a “good state” as he admitted that after the economic turmoil of recent weeks his own mortgage payments have gone up.

“Mortgage rates have gone up for everyone who has a mortgage, and I have a mortgage,” he said.

“Any floating rate mortgages have gone up.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player


Kwarteng’s options for national debt

‘Be careful about forecasts’

Prior to his interview, new Office for National Statistics figures revealed that Britain’s economy fell by 0.3% between July and August, down from downwardly revised growth of 0.1% the previous month.

But Mr Rees-Mogg urged caution in interpreting them.

“The previous quarters figure showed a contraction, was then revised to show economic growth. So, be very careful about how you interpret figures immediately after they’re released,” he told Sky News.

“It’s a small amount of a very large economy, but these figures are notorious for being revised afterwards.”

The business secretary also refused to indicate his own view on whether benefits should rise in line with inflation amid an internal Conservative Party row over the issue.

“We haven’t yet had the inflation figure on which benefits will be set. So, that is something that will be decided once the figure is available,” he said.

“Most predictions, most economic forecasts, turn out to be inaccurate rather than spot on. So, one has got to be careful about forecasts.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player


Are we set for another era of austerity?

MPs call for decision on benefits

Mr Rees-Mogg continued: “There is a process for making this decision. This decision will be made once the figures come out.

“The statutory instrument has to be laid in November to put through the increase. That will be done in the normal way. This is completely routine governmental decision-making.”

In the commons on Tuesday former cabinet minister Julian Smith warned Mr Kwarteng that the government must not balance tax cuts “on the back of the poorest people in our country”.

The government has already been forced to abandon plans to scrap the top 45p rate of tax in the face of a threatened revolt.

Click to subscribe to the Sophy Ridge on Sunday podcast

Prime Minister Liz Truss will face MPs in the commons on Wednesday for the first time since Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s £43 billion tax-cutting mini-budget caused economic turmoil.

On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned Mr Kwarteng’s package of unfunded tax cuts was making it harder for the Bank to get soaring inflation rates under control.

While the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned the chancellor he will have to find £60 billion in public spending cuts if he persists with his tax plans.